Green Leads' Founder, CEO and CMO, Mike Damphousse, writes frequently about b2b marketing, demand generation, appointment setting, lead gen, and marketing in general.
On a recent sales call, the prospect told me he is working with a pay-for- performance appointment setting company like Green Leads. The difference, and the reason for the call, is that he wants more meetings per month, but the other vendor is "dictating the pace" at which he gets them. Was I dreaming? Did I hear that right?
If you are paying for performance after the meeting takes place, isn't the vendor incentivized to deliver the exact number of meetings you ask for? Frankly, by not delivering the requested run rate of appointments, the vendor is (a) disappointing the client and (b) leaving money on the table.
Whether you have an internal team or an external team, whether it is pay for performance or retainer based, here are a couple of lead gen tips for you:
Witnessing the recent Scott Brown senatorial campaign in Massachussetts caused me to question the value of mudslinging -- I'm sure Coakley's staff is analyzing the same.
A week after the election, the topic surfaced again after reading a recent article on HubSpot's blog, Are You Unwittingly Making This Disastrous Sales Mistake?, focused on turning a bland, salesy voicemail into a compelling voicemail. Guest authored by Jill Konrath, who wrote the book Selling to Big Companies, it suggested language for more effective voice messages. And it sparked a controversial thread of blog comments led by Luke Brown, who signs his comment posts "Sales Pro", but the comments soon turned to mudslinging.
Let's analyze the marketing value. Negative blog posts/comments that create controversy also create traffic. Marketers love traffic. So is the strategy of going negative worth the traffic it generates?
Most controversy revolves around intelligent debate, but occasionally it slips (degenerates?) into ranting. The former can be valuable, the latter ... just plain damaging.
Tips to take advantage of a controversy:
The controversy that sparked this article had turned into a one-sided war from Luke, who wrote a scathing blog post on the topic and offered a $10k A-B challenge to Jill. He even posted a negative Amazon review on her book and posed a question about voicemails on LinkedIn that assaulted her anew (then pulled it off after a few days.) I'm sure his site traffic was up (I visited several times to try to find value), but I'm also sure his negative branding offset the traffic.
Healthy debate draws interest and showcases your thinking abilities. What about a personal crusade over a difference of opinion? Would you do business or hang out with a mud-slinger?
© 2014 Green Leads Holdings, LLC 2006-2012 All Rights Reserved. Green Leads® is a Registered Trademark.